Sell old phone used phone to tradelectronc sydney today for best price! For oppo, R series is definitely the mainstay of brand rise in the past few years. Although in some people’s eyes, many of its products may not match, you can’t deny that this series has indeed fostered user loyalty for oppo. And without its huge shipment to provide performance guarantee, it’s hard to say whether the long-awaited find model has any chance to return to glory and amaze the whole audience.
However, in 2019, such a product line chose to take the lead and give up to the brand-new Reno. According to Shen Yiren, a senior executive of netred, the latter shoulders the mission of “opening the next decade of oppo”. Do the two new renos really have such abilities?
In the past two years, oppo’s main mobile phones have gradually broken away from the “notch” of the iPhone. As a new beginning, Reno should also set up its own style in design. So on the two products of this series, we saw the rear camera placed in the middle line of the back cover instead of the upper left corner, and a set of side rotation lifting structure that had not been expected before. When the latter is hidden, it can ensure the visual effect of the front real and full screen, and its built-in earpiece / speaker can also make sound normally through several holes on the top edge. After it is raised, its shape has the meaning of fins. In addition to the selfie camera, the front and back two fill lights are also set on the active mechanism.
Since last year’s vivo nex, there have been several mobile phones that hide cameras by using automatic sliders (basically from OV two factories), but they are really unique in their strange and special shapes like Reno, at least they are better than other products in recognition. The way to install the rear flashing lights on the slider is not as extreme as find X. however, it also reflects the idea that oppo wants to make the relatively uncommon components “disappear” as much as possible, so as to make the surface of the fuselage look more concise. In practice, the structure seems to be a little unstable at first glance, but it is very reliable. When it detects a drop, it will automatically fold up, generally not so easy to damage. Of course, there are some common problems in the lifting structure, such as Reno. It’s easy for the dust to get into the slit beside the slider. It’s a common practice to wipe the camera first after it rises.
Although the core CMOS of the two Reno rear mounted cameras is the most popular Sony imx586 at present, due to the differences in camera quantity, matching lens and device SOC, they are actually two quite different shooting systems. First of all, the standard version is equipped with a 5MP depth of field camera in addition to the 48mp main photoreceptor (using F / 1.7 lens). In daily shooting, it is output in 12MP mode after pixel four in one. The 48mp mode option is hidden deeply (it can only be found when the photo size reaches the bottom). After enabling, the details will be enhanced, but the sharpening degree in some scenes will be a little too much.
In the environment with good light conditions, the photos taken by Reno standard edition have enough brightness and analytical power. The color style of the image is more natural and real, and it doesn’t flatter the eyes at once (it will become a little bit more gorgeous after turning on “dazzle color mode”). The brightness of night shooting is acceptable, and the whole picture is clear and clean. If you use night view mode at the right time, you will get good results, but if you don’t use it well, the brightness and sharpness of the picture will be very unnatural. In addition, in portrait mode (whether shooting people or self shooting with a 16mp front-end camera), Reno’s beauty effect still gains a lot of praise, but in depth of field simulation, it feels more backward than before. The author has encountered several times that the back view face has not been virtualized successfully. It is estimated that this may be due to the imperfection of the initial firmware.
The two renos are equipped with snapdragon 710 and 855 processors. Ram and storage are available in 6GB / 8GB and 128GB / 256gb depending on the model. Among them, the configuration of standard version is quite common, but it has been felt that the zoom version ram of flagship positioning takes off from 6GB, which will be a little insufficient in 2019.
As for the endurance, the Reno zoom version with 4065mah battery can rank in the top position in this generation of flagship that I have used, and the standard version with 3765mah also has a moderate result. If it is not used seriously, both phones can last for about one to two days, which will not cause much anxiety. In terms of charging speed, oppo only matches Reno with the so-called vooc 3.0 instead of the supervooc that was practiced last year, which is somewhat regrettable. However, the new version of the scheme can reduce the charging time by 23.8% while maintaining the same maximum 20W power as the vooc 2.0. According to the actual test, the two machines can fill 45% of the power in half an hour, and the full time is about 70 minutes, which is acceptable but the result is not outstanding.
